Prior posts in this series:
In this post I list the stations with the lowest probabilities of busting a call in CQ WW SSB from 2005 to 2016, using the procedure developed in the second post above.
2005 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
OH5BM |
0.0005 |
1904 |
0 |
2 |
9A2EU |
0.0008 |
1175 |
0 |
3 |
N5AU |
0.0012 |
802 |
0 |
4 |
UA1OMX |
0.0015 |
649 |
0 |
5 |
V31MQ |
0.0017 |
563 |
0 |
6 |
UR6IJ |
0.0018 |
533 |
0 |
7 |
ES5RY |
0.0019 | 1068 |
1 |
8 |
KF2O |
0.0020 |
488 |
0 |
9 |
DL3BRA |
0.0021 |
470 |
0 |
10 |
EA1JO |
0.0022 |
457 |
0 |
It is also interesting to plot the aggregated probability function for $p_{bust}$, weighted by the number of verified QSOs, $Q_v$, for all stations:
The location of the vertical line represents the weighted mean of the probability curve.
2006 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
VA7RR |
0.0008 |
1192 |
0 |
2 |
W1CU |
0.0009 |
1052 |
0 |
3 |
PA0JNH |
0.0012 |
795 |
0 |
4 |
EI4DW |
0.0014 |
700 |
0 |
5 |
9A2EU |
0.0015 |
1346 |
1 |
6 |
YM2W |
0.0015 |
649 |
0 |
7 |
PC4M |
0.0015 | 647 |
0 |
8 |
K1GU |
0.0015 |
630 |
0 |
9 |
AA8LL |
0.0016 |
592 |
0 |
10 |
LY3CY |
0.0017 |
588 |
0 |
2007 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
IZ3KKE |
0.0014 |
668 |
0 |
2 |
VR10XLN |
0.0015 |
629 |
0 |
3 |
N2LBR |
0.0016 |
590 |
0 |
4 |
RV6LFE |
0.0017 |
1203 |
1 |
5 |
DL4LBK |
0.0019 |
519 |
0 |
6 |
LY3CY |
0.0019 |
516 |
0 |
7 |
DH0GHU |
0.0020 | 1017 |
1 |
8 |
LY4DX |
0.0020 |
489 |
0 |
9 |
9M6XRO |
0.0020 |
485 |
0 |
10 |
K0GEO |
0.0021 |
471 |
0 |
2008 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
DL9DRA |
0.0011 |
821 |
0 |
2 |
AL9A |
0.0012 |
813 |
0 |
3 |
K3OO |
0.0012 |
804 |
0 |
4 |
W2IRT |
0.0012 |
779 |
0 |
5 |
IU9A |
0.0013 |
762 |
0 |
6 |
N8BJQ |
0.0015 |
652 |
0 |
7 |
VE4EAR |
0.0016 | 608 |
0 |
8 |
K3WI |
0.0016 |
597 |
0 |
9 |
DF2RG |
0.0017 |
564 |
0 |
10 |
MU0GSY |
0.0017 |
559 |
0 |
2009 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
PY2EX |
0.0009 |
1065 |
0 |
2 |
JS3CTQ |
0.0011 |
858 |
0 |
3 |
UN2E |
0.0013 |
718 |
0 |
4 |
UA3LHL |
0.0014 |
711 |
0 |
5 |
VE2IM |
0.0014 |
2804 |
3 |
6 |
AA8LL |
0.0014 |
676 |
0 |
7 |
K3WI |
0.0015 | 656 |
0 |
8 |
KG4W |
0.0016 |
604 |
0 |
9 |
N2ZX |
0.0016 |
595 |
0 |
10 |
OQ5M |
0.0016 |
592 |
0 |
2010 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
RW1CW |
0.0007 |
1266 |
0 |
2 |
S56A |
0.0009 |
1108 |
0 |
3 |
N0HR |
0.0011 |
860 |
0 |
4 |
TM4W |
0.0012 |
821 |
0 |
5 |
N4PQX |
0.0012 |
770 |
0 |
6 |
DF2RG |
0.0014 |
669 |
0 |
7 |
DK5DQ |
0.0014 | 1384 |
1 |
8 |
W6YA |
0.0015 |
647 |
0 |
9 |
DJ5MW |
0.0015 |
1970 |
2 |
10 |
KR2Q |
0.0015 |
631 |
0 |
2011 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
W4ZV |
0.0006 |
1464 |
0 |
2 |
N4TZ |
0.0007 |
1374 |
0 |
3 |
NW2K |
0.0010 |
896 |
0 |
4 |
LY3CY |
0.0012 |
826 |
0 |
5 |
K7EDX |
0.0012 |
815 |
0 |
6 |
SP9XCN |
0.0012 |
3256 |
3 |
7 |
DL3LAB |
0.0013 | 763 |
0 |
8 |
S56A |
0.0013 |
741 |
0 |
9 |
LY5E |
0.0014 |
712 |
0 |
10 |
W4EF |
0.0014 |
684 |
0 |
2012 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
N1IBM |
0.0010 |
914 |
0 |
2 |
K3TEJ |
0.0011 |
878 |
0 |
3 |
LZ1DM |
0.0012 |
815 |
0 |
4 |
HB9ARF |
0.0012 |
799 |
0 |
5 |
ND0C |
0.0013 |
764 |
0 |
6 |
K0AP |
0.0013 |
763 |
0 |
7 |
JM1NKT |
0.0013 | 750 |
0 |
8 |
DF2RG |
0.0013 |
747 |
0 |
9 |
AA4R |
0.0013 |
734 |
0 |
10 |
K2RD |
0.0014 |
708 |
0 |
2013 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
N1EU |
0.0006 |
1603 |
0 |
2 |
9A2EU |
0.0007 |
1399 |
0 |
3 |
W3GQ |
0.0007 |
1280 |
0 |
4 |
NW0M |
0.0009 |
1025 |
0 |
5 |
LY3CY |
0.0010 |
956 |
0 |
6 |
DM5EE |
0.0011 |
854 |
0 |
7 |
RU3SD |
0.0011 | 849 |
0 |
8 |
DK2CX |
0.0013 |
1563 |
1 |
9 |
G4IIY |
0.0013 |
747 |
0 |
10 |
OR2A |
0.0014 |
747 |
0 |
2014 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
DL1NKS |
0.0005 |
1751 |
0 |
2 |
W3GQ |
0.0006 |
1471 |
0 |
3 |
RU6K |
0.0007 |
1284 |
0 |
4 |
DL1NEO |
0.0008 |
1145 |
0 |
5 |
N9ZM |
0.0010 |
971 |
0 |
6 |
N4PQX |
0.0010 |
967 |
0 |
7 |
LI5LJA |
0.0010 | 958 |
0 |
8 |
NM1C |
0.0010 |
953 |
0 |
9 |
K5ZD |
0.0011 |
2713 |
2 |
10 |
RA4DR |
0.0011 |
857 |
0 |
2015 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
ES2MC |
0.0007 |
1371 |
0 |
2 |
K5LLA |
0.0007 |
1346 |
0 |
3 |
N2SQW |
0.0008 |
1137 |
0 |
4 |
N4KG |
0.0010 |
911 |
0 |
5 |
PZ5RA |
0.0011 |
1892 |
1 |
6 |
S56A |
0.0011 |
894 |
0 |
7 |
VA7RR |
0.0011 | 1789 |
1 |
8 |
VE3CV |
0.0011 |
850 |
0 |
9 |
OH6GDX |
0.0012 |
818 |
0 |
10 |
N5ZC |
0.0012 |
774 |
0 |
2016 CQ WW SSB -- weighted mean values of $p_{bust}$ |
Position |
Call |
weighted mean |
$Q_v$ |
$B$ |
1 |
DL7URH |
0.0008 |
1209 |
0 |
2 |
W1GD |
0.0009 |
1065 |
0 |
3 |
DK2LO |
0.0011 |
869 |
0 |
4 |
N4KG |
0.0012 |
809 |
0 |
5 |
OE1HHB |
0.0012 |
807 |
0 |
6 |
N4PQX |
0.0013 |
759 |
0 |
7 |
DL9DRA |
0.0013 | 754 |
0 |
8 |
I4XNN |
0.0013 |
743 |
0 |
9 |
R7MM |
0.0013 |
717 |
0 |
10 |
DJ6OZ |
0.0014 |
697 |
0 |
NB: it is, of course, much easier to copy a callsign correctly if one
calls stations rather than running them. Indeed, a reasonably careful station that restricts itself to calling others should never make a mistake in copying a callsign. In the above analysis, there is no attempt to distinguish which station is calling which. Therefore we will refine this analysis in a later post, restricting it to running stations.
One thing stands out from the above plots: the distribution function for $p_{bust}$ across all entrants is remarkably robust. Here is a plot of the weighted mean of $p_{bust}$ as a function of time:
The long-term trend is for an improvement in accuracy (obviously a good thing), but the last few years seem to have stabilised around a mean weighted probability of a bust of about 1.7%.
If you wish to perform your own analyses, a file of the SSB weighted means of the $p_{bust}$ probability function for each individual station (not just the top-ten stations listed above)
is available for the period 2005 to 2016. (You can, of course, create your own dataset(s) from the
full augmented data files.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.