Reverse NILs in CQ WW: 2011

The basic notion of reverse NILs (rNILs; or, I suppose, RNILs) is described here, along with a description of a simple script for calculating rNILs for CQ WW contests and the result of applying that code to the contests for 2005. See also the comments at the end of that post.

Here are the results for 2011:

2011 SSB:

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs
OG5B	1172	1171
VA3SWG	1157	945
SI9AM	2373	822
ZW8T	1985	682
LY1G	664	659
R3ZV	736	652
UN7BEW	667	635
PY2NY	1181	626
JK1OPL	760	564
R7AW	749	547

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs	% rNILs
OG5B	1172	1171	99.9
LY1G	664	659	99.2
ZP6DYA	132	131	99.2
N3UA	359	356	99.2
NY4S	105	104	99.0
F4CGJ	96	95	99.0
F4FYG	91	90	98.9
K4CEB	159	156	98.1
JE1GZB	283	274	96.8
EE5W	149	143	96.0

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	rNILs against Ws
NR5M	136	60
N9RV	123	49
N7DD	67	42
AA4V/VP9	1956	38
KU1CW	61	33
W0AIH	196	32
KV0Q	53	31
W3LPL	275	15
K7ZSD	123	13
NK7U	314	12

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	Total rNILs against Ws	% rNILs against Ws
N7DD	67	42	62.7
KV0Q	53	31	58.5
KU1CW	61	33	54.1
NR5M	136	60	44.1
N9RV	123	49	39.8
WN9O	36	8	22.2
N3RS	36	7	19.4
W0AIH	196	32	16.3
KI7M	38	6	15.8
W7IJ	27	4	14.8

2011 CW:

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs
UA1CEC	1168	1157
RA3ATE	908	903
YB4IR	913	894
YL2SW	838	836
UA4CNZ	565	561
RM2T	533	532
I1XSG	533	527
OH2LU	737	413
JR4GPA	930	372
VE1DX	782	366

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs	% rNILs
RM2T	533	532	99.8
YL2SW	838	836	99.8
UA3TJF	308	307	99.7
UT5DJ	265	264	99.6
RA3ATE	908	903	99.4
UA4CNZ	565	561	99.3
N6NF	137	136	99.3
DL5SVB	131	130	99.2
RK4S	124	123	99.2
UA1CEC	1168	1157	99.1

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	rNILs against Ws
NR5M	316	59
N9RV	78	51
N0NI	91	42
K0RF	237	10
NR4M	147	9
KC1XX	260	8
K5GO	91	8
W2PV	132	8
K3LR	220	7
N5FO	45	7

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	Total rNILs against Ws	% rNILs against Ws
N9RV	78	51	65.4
N0NI	91	42	46.2
NR5M	316	59	18.7
N5FO	45	7	15.6
W1WEF	26	4	15.4
NS2X	38	5	13.2
N3CZ	39	5	12.8
AA1K	30	3	10.0
W7VJ	62	6	9.7
N0IJ	33	3	9.1

Arguably no major anomalies there, although, depending on the resources available to the CQ WW Contest Committee, a closer inspection of some of the logs placed highly in the fourth and eighth tables might have been warranted (maybe such inspection took place; I have no way of knowing).