Reverse NILs in CQ WW: 2012

The basic notion of reverse NILs (rNILs; or, I suppose, RNILs) is described here, along with a description of a simple script for calculating rNILs for CQ WW contests and the result of applying that code to the contests for 2005. See also the comments at the end of that post.

Here are the results for 2012:

2012 SSB:

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs
F8EMH	1069	1025
YY4HAH	493	489
EA3ODC	395	393
OK1KZ	472	376
JR4GPA	546	363
OT5A	9345	297
CT2GQN	535	271
PH75S	1319	239
3G3BC	240	227
RL2A	228	226

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs	% rNILs
EA3ODC	395	393	99.5
EA7JDR	187	186	99.5
YY4HAH	493	489	99.2
UA6HHE	118	117	99.2
RL2A	228	226	99.1
DO4MTB	88	87	98.9
W6P	152	149	98.0
F8EMH	1069	1025	95.9
R7AC	185	177	95.7
3G3BC	240	227	94.6

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	rNILs against Ws
KV0Q	72	34
N2IC	101	30
N7DD	70	29
W3LPL	375	13
W7VJ	66	12
W4RM	164	9
K3LR	466	7
KC1XX	277	7
W4QNW	34	7
AD4Z	91	6

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	Total rNILs against Ws	% rNILs against Ws
KV0Q	72	34	47.2
N7DD	70	29	41.4
N2IC	101	30	29.7
W4QNW	34	7	20.6
W7VJ	66	12	18.2
W7WA	25	4	16.0
NJ6G	25	4	16.0
WB9Z	33	4	12.1
K1ZR	47	5	10.6
K1GI	29	3	10.3

2012 CW:

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs
JR4GPA	787	491
UT4AA	499	483
K4LTA	695	419
OK1KZ	456	407
DJ6TK	743	353
C5A	12408	258
JH1GNU	313	255
D4C	14409	251
LZ2PT	269	251
JK1OPL	776	226

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs	% rNILs
UT4AA	499	483	96.8
LZ2PT	269	251	93.3
OK1KZ	456	407	89.3
HP1DCP	136	118	86.8
JH1GNU	313	255	81.5
DL2YED	150	107	71.3
UT5CY	196	137	69.9
JE2VYM	53	36	67.9
HL3AMO	277	184	66.4
JR4GPA	787	491	62.4

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	rNILs against Ws
NR5M	62	48
KN7K	98	24
N7DD	27	23
W0AIH	217	14
K0RF	319	12
WT1T	169	9
W6SDM	99	9
W4JHC	29	9
W3LPL	296	8
W3UA	55	6

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	Total rNILs against Ws	% rNILs against Ws
N7DD	27	23	85.2
NR5M	62	48	77.4
W4JHC	29	9	31.0
KN7K	98	24	24.5
K1LI	26	5	19.2
N0YY	30	5	16.7
K5TR	28	4	14.3
NY3A	31	4	12.9
KE7DX	45	5	11.1
W3UA	55	6	10.9

We've done enough of these now that I don't think I need to suggest which logs might have rewarded a closer look. And I emphasise that, for all I know, the CQ WW Contest Committee did indeed look in detail at some of the anomalous logs and found nothing amiss. One certainly hopes that this is the case.