The basic notion of reverse NILs (rNILs; or, I suppose, RNILs) is described
here, along with a description of a
simple script for calculating rNILs for
CQ WW contests and the result of applying that code to the contests for 2005. See also the comments at the end of that post.
Here are the results for 2009:
2009 SSB:
Callsign |
Total rQSOs |
Total rNILs |
3W1M |
1338 |
986 |
A41MX |
822 |
814 |
A47RS |
1639 |
784 |
HK3JJH |
733 |
661 |
LU2QC |
1110 |
645 |
IR6D |
633 |
597 |
S57RTH |
1015 |
551 |
DJ0AH |
531 |
526 |
PI4COM |
2775 |
519 |
EA3RCB |
495 |
489 |
Callsign |
Total rQSOs |
Total rNILs |
% rNILs |
N2ED |
366 |
365 |
99.7 |
CX5TR |
308 |
307 |
99.7 |
UT5ID |
475 |
473 |
99.6 |
PY3PA |
231 |
230 |
99.6 |
9A7YY |
185 |
184 |
99.5 |
LY2OM |
365 |
363 |
99.5 |
UX2MK |
163 |
162 |
99.4 |
EA9BO |
158 |
157 |
99.4 |
EA1GAZ |
145 |
144 |
99.3 |
IZ0BVU |
232 |
230 |
99.1 |
Callsign |
Total rQSOs with Ws |
rNILs against Ws |
NR5M |
439 |
45 |
N5DX |
142 |
30 |
AA4V/VP9 |
1256 |
19 |
K3LR |
308 |
17 |
K7ZSD |
113 |
17 |
N0NI |
65 |
16 |
W3TB/VP9 |
730 |
15 |
K1TTT |
250 |
12 |
W3LPL |
226 |
12 |
N7BT |
43 |
12 |
Callsign |
Total rQSOs with Ws |
Total rNILs against Ws |
% rNILs against Ws |
N2RRA |
27 |
8 |
29.6 |
W8BI |
28 |
8 |
28.6 |
N7BT |
43 |
12 |
27.9 |
N0NI |
65 |
16 |
24.6 |
N5DX |
142 |
30 |
21.1 |
W0UA |
49 |
9 |
18.4 |
K7ZSD |
113 |
17 |
15.0 |
N6AQ |
31 |
4 |
12.9 |
K9LA |
25 |
3 |
12.0 |
WB9Z |
44 |
5 |
11.4 |
2009 CW:
Callsign |
Total rQSOs |
Total rNILs |
VU2PAI |
1469 |
1452 |
IT9INO |
1133 |
1099 |
ON4IA |
814 |
768 |
HC2SL |
1042 |
569 |
SJ2W |
2638 |
455 |
RV9CP |
620 |
439 |
KE2WY |
477 |
431 |
EA1FBU |
430 |
428 |
OK1KZ |
502 |
402 |
TA2KK |
848 |
313 |
Callsign |
Total rQSOs |
Total rNILs |
% rNILs |
EA1FBU |
430 |
428 |
99.5 |
W2TB |
158 |
157 |
99.4 |
VK4TI |
106 |
105 |
99.1 |
PU5AAD |
97 |
96 |
99.0 |
DL1HSI |
97 |
96 |
99.0 |
VU2PAI |
1469 |
1452 |
98.8 |
DL8TG |
86 |
85 |
98.8 |
F6KMX |
53 |
52 |
98.1 |
RW6BD |
134 |
131 |
97.8 |
IT9INO |
1133 |
1099 |
97.0 |
Callsign |
Total rQSOs with Ws |
rNILs against Ws |
NR5M |
429 |
40 |
KV0Q |
39 |
38 |
K0RF |
300 |
27 |
NQ4I |
319 |
19 |
K1LZ |
197 |
18 |
N7DD |
104 |
14 |
K1TTT |
249 |
13 |
WR7Q |
74 |
13 |
K5GO |
200 |
10 |
K3LR |
343 |
10 |
Callsign |
Total rQSOs with Ws |
Total rNILs against Ws |
% rNILs against Ws |
KV0Q |
39 |
38 |
97.4 |
W1PID |
28 |
6 |
21.4 |
WN9O |
35 |
7 |
20.0 |
WR7Q |
74 |
13 |
17.6 |
K9RS |
53 |
9 |
17.0 |
WB9Z |
37 |
6 |
16.2 |
K5MR |
62 |
10 |
16.1 |
K3ZM |
47 |
7 |
14.9 |
W5VX |
42 |
6 |
14.3 |
N7DD |
104 |
14 |
13.5 |
KV0Q's CW (single-band) log stands out as being anomalous. I have seen no evidence that he was invited to provide an explanation for its lack of recorded W QSOs.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.