Reverse NILs in CQ WW: 2006

The basic notion of reverse NILs (rNILs; or, I suppose, RNILs) is described here, along with a description of a simple script for calculating rNILs for CQ WW contests and the result of applying that code to the contests for 2005. See also the comments at the end of that post.

Here are the results for 2006:

2006 SSB:

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs
IZ8EPX	1348	1345
F5BBD	1025	925
RW3WWW	1798	813
PY5DC	777	765
9Y4NZ	1520	734
EI9E	1881	730
PI4ZI	724	721
OA4WW	2841	668
VP2MDY	1866	656
YU1HFG	658	650

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs	% rNILs
IZ8EPX	1348	1345	99.8
N3BNA	347	346	99.7
I8TWB	272	271	99.6
PI4ZI	724	721	99.6
LA2OKA	220	219	99.5
EX7ML	162	161	99.4
IT9YVO	304	302	99.3
IW2MWZ	132	131	99.2
PY3DX	230	228	99.1
PY6KY	107	106	99.1

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	rNILs against Ws
N7DD	84	77
N2IC	82	30
W3LPL	187	30
KV0Q	57	25
K3LR	274	21
NQ4I	309	20
W7WA	52	19
K6OP	32	16
KC1XX	165	13
NK7U	170	12

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	Total rNILs against Ws	% rNILs against Ws
N7DD	84	77	91.7
K6OP	32	16	50.0
KV0Q	57	25	43.9
N2IC	82	30	36.6
W7WA	52	19	36.5
NE3F	48	11	22.9
K1IR	30	6	20.0
W3BGN	30	6	20.0
N2MM	41	8	19.5
W2CG	28	5	17.9

2006 CW:

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs
RU9UZM	1384	1245
HK1AR	1192	1101
RN4AT	806	794
YO7BGA	762	746
EA8NN	888	686
WX4G	1085	640
S51Z	1303	620
PA3ADJ	611	594
EU4CQ	462	461
HS0ZFI	625	436

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs	% rNILs
EU4CQ	462	461	99.8
M0RTI	284	283	99.6
DK7KR	424	422	99.5
UT1PO	294	292	99.3
RK3WWA	194	192	99.0
RN4AT	806	794	98.5
F5NCU	444	435	98.0
YO7BGA	762	746	97.9
VE2DWA	132	129	97.7
PA3ADJ	611	594	97.2

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	rNILs against Ws
N4PN	38	18
K5GO	224	17
K1TTT	147	14
N6RO	286	13
W3LPL	237	12
W0AIH	135	11
K3LR	184	10
NQ4I	185	10
AA6DY	62	9
NR4M	51	9

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	Total rNILs against Ws	% rNILs against Ws
N4PN	38	18	47.4
KG4FSN	26	7	26.9
N2KPB	39	9	23.1
K2BA	33	7	21.2
N2MM	29	6	20.7
KB9YGD	30	6	20.0
K2AX	47	9	19.1
W4MYA	32	6	18.8
NR4M	51	9	17.6
AA6DY	62	9	14.5

On the basis of these tables, a closer look at N7DD's entry in the SSB contest would probably have been in order, as his rNIL rate against Ws was nearly twice that of the next station in the table. Possibly N4PN's entry in the CW contest was worthy of a closer look as well.