Reverse NILs in CQ WW: 2007

The basic notion of reverse NILs (rNILs; or, I suppose, RNILs) is described here, along with a description of a simple script for calculating rNILs for CQ WW contests and the result of applying that code to the contests for 2005. See also the comments at the end of that post.

Here are the results for 2007:

2007 SSB:

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs
OT5L	2560	2516
ER5GB	815	814
SN1I	951	625
T99W	1571	578
LZ1ND	482	481
6Y1V	5555	450
EA1ET	853	433
OK1KZ	524	432
YV4A	3003	420
PY2AA	892	418

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs	% rNILs
ER5GB	815	814	99.9
LZ1ND	482	481	99.8
PY2TW	139	138	99.3
F4EWU	231	229	99.1
DJ6XV	105	104	99.0
OK1JN	92	91	98.9
AG9D	84	83	98.8
IQ3EZ	82	81	98.8
VU2SWS	315	311	98.7
IT9YVO	312	308	98.7

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	rNILs against Ws
N7DD	91	81
K7ZSD	79	34
N2IC	92	31
K3LR	352	28
KU1CW	35	17
K1TTT	243	14
W0AIH	77	13
W3PP	52	11
W4WS	43	11
NQ4I	190	11

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	Total rNILs against Ws	% rNILs against Ws
N7DD	91	81	89.0
KU1CW	35	17	48.6
K7ZSD	79	34	43.0
W0YR	25	9	36.0
N2IC	92	31	33.7
K1VU	32	10	31.2
W4WS	43	11	25.6
W3PP	52	11	21.2
W0AIH	77	13	16.9
W7WA	36	5	13.9

2007 CW:

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs
LT1F	4304	4291
SV1ENG	1632	1561
IH9U	879	826
OK1FZM	575	571
OK1KZ	481	365
UA9OW	344	343
DK3GI	1606	300
UX2MF	369	298
S56A	613	291
YO2LEA	289	288

Callsign	Total rQSOs	Total rNILs	% rNILs
UA9OW	344	343	99.7
LT1F	4304	4291	99.7
YO2LEA	289	288	99.7
9G5ZS	198	197	99.5
W9/DM5TI	153	152	99.3
OK1FZM	575	571	99.3
SM0KV	102	101	99.0
DL1EHR	193	191	99.0
DJ2SX	112	109	97.3
SV1ENG	1632	1561	95.6

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	rNILs against Ws
K0RF	169	63
W9/DM5TI	47	46
N7UA	25	18
K0XTR	25	15
N3RS	111	14
K5GO	193	14
N6RO	432	12
K1TTT	169	12
NQ4I	192	10
K3LR	177	8

Callsign	Total rQSOs with Ws	Total rNILs against Ws	% rNILs against Ws
W9/DM5TI	47	46	97.9
N7UA	25	18	72.0
K0XTR	25	15	60.0
K0RF	169	63	37.3
N4CJ	25	5	20.0
N7TT	30	5	16.7
W3UA	25	4	16.0
K6OY	26	4	15.4
K1LZ	34	5	14.7
K1RX	49	7	14.3

As in 2006, N7DD's SSB log might have been worthy of a closer look. As far as I know it wasn't called out for examination, but the deliberations of the CQ WW Contest Committee are -- probably on purpose -- shrouded in mystery, so it's impossible to know what investigations, if any, they undertook to understand the cause of statistical anomalies in the various calculations that they (I assume) performed against the logs.